Map Critiques Module 1 GIS 5007

 This week's lesson was a history lesson in cartography and understanding basic mapmaking. The assignment was to identify a well designed map and a poorly designed map. 

For my well designed map, I chose a national park map of Capulin Volcano National Monument in NW New Mexico. It is a park my family and I visited when we took a road trip shortly after returning from Germany. 

https://www.nps.gov/media/photo/collection-item.htm?pg=7347320&cid=305fb7af-a71b-469b-941e-a98b439c882f&id=2d23d9a1-1dc8-423e-b058-1b67cc15b8ae&sid=ddf76276-66ad-45ec-a06d-d4f7651713bc&p=1&sort=relevance

    I chose this map as a well designed map for its simplicity and getting straight to the point. The map is well labeled and identifies the most important features in the park for visitors. It identifies the different trails, their distances, as well as the road and other important facilities. The map is neat and all the essential map elements are easily identifiable and read. Also, the scale bar is an effective measurement for guests of multiple nationalities.


For my poor map design, I found an example on Esri's website identifying maps that you do not want to imitate.

https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/6b168cb3aeb44c84b3ce04ca7fe5222e

First and foremost in my eyes, the neatline is driving me nuts as it cuts in the middle of other map elements. The title is not centered and not spelled correctly. The scale bar is an odd distance, and not especially relevant to this information. What information you ask? Well, the legend is the only way to identify what we are looking at on this map, and it is apparently the attainment of education for people over 24 in Colorado. 

This map looks to be thrown together in about 2.5 minutes by a blind person. Im sure the information is important, but the map maker in question doesn't seem to want to show that importance. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Orientation GIS 5007 Blog Post

Module 5: Parsing Data, Creating XY Data, and Geocoding Addresses